parallel versions of the moca cognitive assessment

Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD (2003) Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Iosa M, Demeyere N, Abbruzzese L, Zoccolotti P, Mancuso M (2022) Principal component analysis of Oxford Cognitive Screen in patients with stroke. Huygelier H, Schraepen B, Demeyere N, Gillebert CR (2019) The Dutch version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-NL): normative data and their association with age and socio-economic status. Valera-Gran D et al (2019) Validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (S-OCS): psychometric properties of a short cognitive stroke-specific screening tool. Shendyapina M et al (2018) The Russian version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen: validation study on stroke survivors. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 1–14.

Robotham RJ, Riis JO, Demeyere N (2019) A Danish version of the Oxford cognitive screen: a stroke-specific screening test as an alternative to the MoCA. Ramos CCF et al (2018) Oxford Cognitive Screen – Brazilian Portuguese version (OCS-Br) a pilot study. Mancuso M et al (2016) Italian normative data for a stroke specific cognitive screening tool: The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS). Hong W et al (2018) Psychometric properties of the Chinese (Putonghua) version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-P) in subacute poststroke patients without neglect. Kong AP-H et al (2016) The Hong Kong version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (HK-OCS): validation study for Cantonese-speaking chronic stroke survivors.

Stolwyk RJ, O’Neill MH, McKay AJD, Wong DK (2014) Are cognitive screening tools sensitive and specific enough for use after stroke?: a systematic literature review. Kosgallana A, Cordato D, Chan DKY, Yong J (2019) Use of cognitive screening tools to detect cognitive impairment after an ischaemic stroke: a systematic review. J Neurol 263:306–315Įlliott E et al (2019) Who is classified as untestable on brief cognitive screens in an acute stroke setting? Diagnostics 9:95 Psychol Assess 27:883–894ĭemeyere N et al (2016) Domain-specific versus generalized cognitive screening in acute stroke. The OCS-NL may be more sensitive to detect cognitive impairment in young stroke patients and less likely to underestimate cognitive abilities in left-hemispheric stroke patients than the MoCA.ĭemeyere N, Riddoch MJ, Slavkova ED, Bickerton W, Humphreys GW (2015) The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS): validation of a stroke-specific short cognitive screening tool. Our results suggest that the OCS-NL is a reliable cognitive screen that can be used in acute stroke and rehabilitation units. Last, although left-hemispheric stroke patients performed worse on almost all MoCA subdomains, they performed similarly to right-hemispheric stroke patients on non-language domains on the OCS-NL. Third, in stroke patients below age 60, the OCS-NL had a 92% sensitivity relative to the MoCA, while the MoCA had a 55% sensitivity relative to the OCS-NL.

Second, the parallel-form reliability ranged from weak to excellent across subtests. For praxis, we observed a 14% lower prevalence of impairment in the rehabilitation than the acute stroke unit. Resultsįirst, we did not find evidence for a difference in prevalence of impairment between patients in the acute stroke versus rehabilitation unit on all but one of the subtests. A subset of patients ( n = 128) completed a retest with the parallel version of the OCS-NL. MethodsĪ total of 193 (99 acute stroke unit, 94 rehabilitation unit) patients were included in our study. In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of the Dutch OCS (OCS-NL). It was originally validated in England for acute stroke patients.

The Oxford Cognitive Screen is a stroke-specific screen to evaluate attention, executive functions, memory, praxis, language, and numeric cognition.

Parallel versions of the moca cognitive assessment